Slippery Slope . . .

I heard about the incident at UC Berkeley last week and recalled a potential event in Skokie, Illinois. It was 1977 and the Nazi Party of America sought to march in Skokie. The marchers were to wear uniforms like those worn by members of Hitler’s Nazi Party. They would have swastika armbands and carry a banner bearing a large swastika.

The Chicago suberb had a population of about 70,000 persons……40,000 of whom were Jewish. Approximately 5000 of those residents were survivors of the Holocaust. Needless to say, the residents of Skokie responded with outrage. They sought a court order in an attempt to stop the march, citing that it would promote hatred against persons of Jewish faith or ancestry.

I remember all of the news coverage this controversy aroused. It was one of those moments in American history when citizens throughout our country emphatically debated the meaning of the United States Constitution. I was 30 years old at the time, with not a whole lot of government information, knowledge, or life experiences behind me. I was appalled that this group would even attempt to do something so hateful! It was such a painful thing to want to do, so I felt it was wrong. Surely, they would NOT be allowed to have this hurtful march. 

However, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) represented the First Amendment rights of the Nazi. I was horrified. And I was young. And I certainly didn’t understand. I’ve always been a live and let live type person, but this made no sense to me. This case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court and the conclusion was that Skokie could not stop the Nazis from marching. I won’t go into the details here, but now, I absolutely agree with that decision. I agree that it was a horrific thing for the Jewish people to endure in Skokie. I agree that it was disgusting for the group to want to do this. And by the way….they ended up not marching in Skokie. By their choice.

But within ten years, as I approached age 40, I went back to study and read about this incident and I completely understood. I understood that we ARE a country of laws and above all else, the rule of law must and can prevail. And I am now a proud card carrying ACLU member.

So this incident last week at UC Berkeley….he was a Breitbart speaker, he’s absolutely a racist, misogynist, white supremacist. But……free speech can be a slippery slope. One cannot have it both ways. He’s disgusting and his values are so far removed from mine. However, when it comes to something like this, I say don’t attend, don’t watch, don’t listen, etc. But……….free speech and upholding that First Amendment MUST prevail.

See you here next time…………..

4 thoughts on “Slippery Slope . . .

  1. Agreed, Terri! Talked to my childhood friend, who was a student at Cal during Free Speech Movement. We concur that Milo’s MESSAGE should have been protested not his RIGHT TO SPEAK. She said: What ever happened to collapsing on the ground and being dragged into the paddy wagon? Why all the violence, the destruction? Could it be that the protesters were paid to create this drama? That the the speech was beside the point? That creating anger, fear, destruction has more impact than a quiet protest? BOTH sides of this issue need to be monitored.


  2. I actually lived in Evanston (right next to Skokie which was home to the “Evanston Golf Course” that always cracked me up) in 1977. Although I didn’t want the Nazis to march there (or anywhere else to be honest), I did not want them banned because of the “slippery slope.” Although I’m deeply offended by most/all of what Milo says, I do think he should have been allowed to speak at Berkeley. If I was there, however, I just wouldn’t attend. I think if we’re really being true to our values, we have to allow things we don’t like, as long as they’re not illegal. Otherwise, we’re guilty of the type of hypocrisy that bothers me so much about many Republicans/conservatives (the biggest one of these is not allowing abortion because “all human life is precious” but being in favor of the death penalty. How does that make sense?)


    • Yes, protest Milo’s speech NOT his right to speak. No need for violence and destruction of university property. My UC Berkely grad friend wonders whatever happened to Free Speech Movement protesters who simply collapsed onto the ground and were dragged to the paddy wagon! (Terri, my first post like this one somehow got lost.)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s